レポート一覧に戻る
NFT
Blockchain Proof
Project Trends
Digital ID
Product-Market Fit
2026年08月06日

7.6 Million Proofs of Attendance, and a Company That Could Not Be Funded: What "Onchain" Actually Guaranteed

760万枚の「参加証明」を残して、POAPは畳まれる——オンチェーンは何を保証していたのか

7.6 Million Badges, and Still Not a Business

POAP began at ETHDenver in 2019 with roughly 100 badges for hackathon participants. POAP Inc. was formally incorporated in 2021, and in January 2022 raised a $10 million seed round led by Archetype and Sapphire Sport. Technically it used the ERC-721 standard, migrating from Ethereum to Gnosis Chain to reduce transaction costs.

The scale was not trivial. According to POAP's website, more than 46,210 issuers minted roughly 7.6 million badges. Partners included Coinbase, American Express, Warner Music Group, and Bayer. At the Ethereum Foundation's Devcon conference, more than 8,000 were issued in a single week, and an "Airport Rally" let travellers collect them at airports worldwide. Inside the crypto industry, this was unambiguously a successful product.

The business nonetheless did not survive. Gonzalez explained that crypto's funding cycles and distribution dynamics made it hard to build a sustainable company without cannibalising the ethos that made POAP mean something. The company had entered "maintenance mode" on March 16, 2026, halting onboarding of new issuers; this announcement carries that through to a full wind-down.

The Price of Having No Token

POAP had no native token. That design choice, defensible on its merits, became the weak point in its revenue structure. Without a token there is no speculative premium, no treasury of appreciating assets, and no built-in flywheel to fund development. Revenue has to come from the service itself.

Projects offering non-financial utility on open infrastructure face a particular bind. Users internalise the norm that basic attestation and verification should not carry heavy price tags, and expect the service to be free or nearly so. POAP distributed largely free for years before introducing charges for commercial issuers, but the line between personal and commercial use proved almost impossible to draw in practice. A DAO meetup with sponsor logos, a wedding with 200 guests, a public-goods hackathon with enterprise partners—none sorted cleanly into either bucket.

In closing, Gonzalez observed that customer communities are the most undervalued asset a company can have. That something is valuable and that its value can be converted into revenue turned out to be separate propositions. The team now says it will focus on developing a new standard for open collectibles.

The Same Week, Nissan's NFTs Were Marked for Deletion

A contrasting case sits in Japan. Nissan announced that NISSAN PASSPORT BETA, a pilot testing new customer relationships through Web3 technology, ends at 18:00 on October 28, 2026—roughly one year and nine months after launching in January 2025, having been announced in December 2024. The initial round provided membership NFTs and a proprietary Web3 wallet to 5,523 applicants, with a community on Discord.

The termination terms are what matter. Tokens remain usable until 23:59 on October 21. And according to Nissan, NFTs currently held will be deleted when the service ends. Membership NFTs were tied to a Nissan ID and could not be transferred, resold, or used in external wallets such as MetaMask. This was never the user's asset; it was a membership entitlement expressed inside Nissan's system using NFT technology.

Nissan did launch a finale project, "KIZUNA HEARTBEAT," on August 5, reflecting participants' profile images, nicknames, and optionally photos and comments about their cars into a single "KIZUNA NFT." That NFT, the company says, will remain on the blockchain after the service ends. Only at the point of closure did a genuinely onchain artefact appear.

"Onchain" Guaranteed Three Different Things

Placing the two cases side by side reveals that "it is recorded on a blockchain, so it persists" has been conflating three distinct levels.

The first is Nissan's. The token lives inside the operator's system and is deleted with the service. Since it cannot leave for an external wallet, it is technically an NFT but, in durability terms, indistinguishable from conventional membership points.

The second is POAP's. Issued badges continue to exist on Gnosis Chain, tied to holders' wallet addresses. That promise is kept. But how long POAP's gallery, APIs, and metadata services stay up depends on whether the company maintains its infrastructure, and no shutdown schedule has been published. The token survives; the machinery that lets anyone read what it attests to may not. The record persists and the meaning fades.

The third is a state where metadata itself is onchain, multiple independent indexers can resolve it, and the standard does not depend on any single company. Only there does the artefact outlive its issuer. The "new standard for open collectibles" POAP's team says it will pursue appears to target exactly this layer.

The value of an attestation resides not in minting a token but in who maintains the machinery that interprets it. What POAP's closure exposes is that the industry has not yet answered who pays for that maintenance.

Business Development Insights

  1. "It's onchain, therefore permanent" is an inadequate durability specification. When tokenising non-financial utility—credentials, qualifications, participation records—three questions belong in the initial design: can the token leave for an external wallet; is metadata onchain or offchain; and does any resolution mechanism exist outside the issuer. Nissan's case fails the first; POAP cleared the first but depended on the company for the second and third. Unless enterprises write this three-layer check into technical requirements, a claim to "record permanently on the blockchain" does not hold. The gap becomes decisive in domains demanding decade-scale durability: professional credentials, learning records, supply chain provenance.
  2. Monetising non-financial utility requires designing the paying party as the issuer from the outset. POAP had no token, which was the healthy choice, and therefore could not lean on speculative capital flows. Users meanwhile held a firm expectation that basic open-protocol functions should be free, and a retrofitted personal-versus-commercial distinction proved unworkable. The same structure applies in Japan, where volunteer credentials issued by local governments or corporate membership proofs cannot realistically charge end users; the cost must sit in the issuer's budget from the start. Conversely, narrowing to attestations an issuer will pay to maintain makes sustainability achievable.
  3. Enterprise Web3 pilots should include end-of-life design as an initial requirement. Nissan's programme ran about one year and nine months and its NFTs will be deleted. For a pilot, ending is not failure. The question is whether what users retain at termination was designed at inception. Nissan's late addition of KIZUNA HEARTBEAT, producing an NFT that persists onchain, reads as a retrospective answer to that question. Companies planning NFT or token-based customer programmes should specify the disposition of assets at termination in the same breath as the launch announcement—necessary both operationally and reputationally. Firms able to supply that perspective hold a clear differentiator in Japan's Web3 consulting market.

Sources

Supervisor

Akihisa Ishida

Cabinet Inc. Founder CEO

Since 2017, He has been consistently engaged in token and NFT utilization, blockchain game planning and development, and NFT-based business development. Having contributed to over 80 blockchain products—including projects for major entertainment companies listed in Tokyo Stock Exchange —He has served in various key roles such as Business Lead, Designer, PM, and Advisor. In 2021, founded Cabinet Inc.

Disclaimer

This report has been prepared solely for informational purposes regarding crypto assets and related markets, and is not intended to recommend, solicit, or offer the purchase, sale, holding, or any other transaction of any specific crypto asset. It does not constitute investment advice, investment solicitation, or the sale or intermediation of financial products as defined under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act or any other applicable laws and regulations, nor does it constitute tax, legal, or accounting advice.

The information contained in this report is based on sources believed to be reliable at the time of preparation; however, we make no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to its accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or usefulness. Crypto assets are subject to significant price volatility and may result in the loss of principal or other financial losses. Any investment decision shall be made solely at the user's own discretion and responsibility, and we accept no liability whatsoever for any damages arising out of or in connection with the use of this report.

Blockchain Business Consultation

From idea-stage brainstorming and technical validation (PoC) to implementation and operations, Cabinet provides end-to-end business development consulting. Start with a free consultation today.

Sign Up for Newsletter

Beyond the content of this report, we will deliver the latest industry information and exclusive reports by email.